Other victims
Reports gathered from other customers of Recon Engines / Wayne Meintjies. New entries are added after moderation. If you would like to add your account, see the Share Your Story page.
Independent victim record
An independent customer has been documenting allegations since 2024 on a separate site, and collects victim reports on WhatsApp at +27 76 295 1882:
reconengineswaynemeintjies9.wordpress.com — "SCAM ALERT Wayne Meintjies Recon Engines Chamdor"
Screenshots of customer reviews
The four reviews below were preserved on the independent WordPress site noted above. They were originally posted on HelloPeter and Google Maps. The independent operator has noted that some of these reviews were subsequently reported and removed from the original platforms — the screenshots are reproduced here as a public record of what customers said at the time they posted them. Each review is identified by reviewer name and original date.
1. Rene U — HelloPeter, 25 May 2023 — "9 months of lies and deceit"
"Wayne (the owner) is the biggest **** and ***** you will ever come across. Worst experience ever!!!! Wayne gave us a quote to fix our car and said it will take 3 weeks. This was just one of his lies. We had to pay the full amount before he even looked at our car. Every week he was adding to the original quote, and we kept on paying believing his lies. Wayne kept our car for 9 months, yes 9 months at his garage, every week a bull**** story that our car will be ready by Monday. After 9 months waiting for our car, and double the amount he quoted, he returned our car still not fixed. I would suggest stay far away from recon engines!!" — Rene U, HelloPeter, 25 May 2023
Pattern points: 3 weeks quoted; full amount paid up front; weekly add-ons to the original quote; 9 months held; double the original price; vehicle returned not fixed.
2. Philip H — HelloPeter, 26 September 2023 — "Terrible service, poor workmanship and empty promises"
"Recon Engines (Wayne Meintjies) is a ***** that consumers need to be protected from. He offered a reconditioned engine on Gumtree for sale, picture was included. Upon enquiring he said the 1 year / 25,000 km warranty was subject to him installing it. Provided a document stipulating price, work to be done, time required and conditions for validating the warranty. That's where the professionalism ended. Once he has your hefty dep…" — Philip H, HelloPeter, 26 September 2023
Pattern points: reconditioned engines advertised on Gumtree; warranty tied to Wayne's own installation; hefty deposit required up front; professionalism ends after deposit is received.
3. Philip Honiball — Google Reviews — detailed mechanical complaint
"Recon Engines (Wayne Meintjies) is a fraud that consumers need to be protected from. He offered a reconditioned engine on Gumtree for sale, picture was included. Upon enquiring he said the 1 year / 25,000 km warranty was subject to him installing it. Provided a document stipulating price, work to be done, time required and conditions for validating the warranty.
That's where the professionalism ended. Once he has your hefty deposit (and vehicle) your trouble starts. 5 weeks later, no engine, no response for update requests unless you send a second and third requests.
Eventually drove to Krugersdorp, just more empty promises and excuses. Another 3 weeks later an engine was installed... well sort of. Bumper beam installed the wrong way round, fixed to chassis with 4 instead of 8 bolts! Dipstick tube installed incorrectly, was underneath aircleaner pipe, not visible or reachable from top of engine. Turbo intake pipe not clamped to turbo, hose clamp missing. Diesel leaks present, diesel pipes incorrectly routed and not fixed to appropriate fixing spots, nuts missing. Various wires hanging loose not fixed to designated attachment points. Bracket to hold airintake pipes in place hanging loose, bolt missing.
Wayne picks victims from rural and outlying areas, get their vehicles on his premises and then he holds all the cards. He shows no respect, has no integrity and uses his smooth talking to get his way. Bottom line, this establishment should stick to reconditioning engines. Leave the installation to professionals with integrity.
The favourable reviews on Google for Recon Engines were not done by actual customers, it was done by people that does work for Recon Engines or that has an interest in Recon Engines or a connection with Wayne. Check out Hello Peter, another case of the client waiting for months for his vehicle. Wayne's excuse of the client not being able to pay, bull. Be aware and be careful when dealing with this establishment. If it was that good, word of mouth is the best advertising and exposure…" — Philip Honiball, Google review
Pattern points: deposit + vehicle = leverage; non-response unless chased; 5 weeks become 3 more weeks; specific mechanical defects on return (bumper beam reversed, 4/8 bolts, dipstick wrong, turbo unclamped, diesel leaks, missing fixings); allegation of fake favourable reviews; "Wayne picks victims from rural and outlying areas".
4. Jaco B — HelloPeter, 16 May 2024 — flatbedded the car away
"Paid this guy R45,000 deposit on 24 Feb 23.
On 25 April 23, he told me he needed the outstanding R20,000 (just to buy the small stuff he needs to complete the motor).
On 13 March 24, I paid R2,800 for "diagnostics".
On 16 April 24, I paid R10,600 for cam sensors.
On 15 May 24 I had to get a flatbed to go take my car away from this **** artist.
His name is Wayne.
15 months, and the quote I just got to fix the car is more than R100k.
Stay away from him and his business. It will cost you dearly." — Jaco B, HelloPeter, 16 May 2024
Pattern points: R45,000 deposit Feb 2023; R20,000 mid-job "for small stuff"; R2,800 + R10,600 in further payments more than a year later; 15 months elapsed; vehicle flatbedded out; a fresh R100k+ quote to actually finish the work.
The same pattern, multiple victims
Read together, these four independent reviews — posted across 13 months by four different customers — describe materially the same sequence of events:
- Quote with a warranty figure ("1 year / 25,000 km") tied to Wayne installing the engine himself.
- Substantial deposit demanded up front, often with the full amount required before work begins.
- Further "mid-job" payments requested for unspecified parts or services.
- The 2 – 3 week / 5 week / 3 week turnaround becomes 9 months, 15 months, and counting.
- Communication only when the customer chases — multiple times.
- Where the vehicle is returned, it is returned with serious defects or simply not working.
- The customer ends up paying double — or being given a fresh six-figure quote to actually fix the vehicle.
Adding the site operator's own experience (R100,000 paid, 14+ months elapsed, vehicle still not returned) and the eNCA "Devi" episode of 21 September 2025, this is now a documented multi-year, multi-victim pattern.
Public reviews already in the record
HelloPeter — "Avoid Recon Engines and Wayne Meintjies at All Costs"
1 star January 2025 Recon Engines Chamdor
A review posted on HelloPeter directly naming Wayne Meintjies and warning other consumers away from the business.
HelloPeter — "This is not a business, it's a blatant…"
1 star Recon Engines Chamdor
A further review on the same business profile.
AfricaComplaints — "Engine Overhaul. Disgrace"
AfricaComplaints
A separate consumer complaint about an engine overhaul performed by Recon Engines.
JustAnswer — public legal-advice query
JustAnswer
A public legal-advice query referencing Wayne Meintjies and Recon Engines.
Site-submitted accounts
Accounts submitted directly to this site via the Share Your Story form, published with the submitter's consent.
Alan Jones — Mitsubishi Pajero CK V6 — R120,000 — 23+ months and counting
R120,000 paid Mitsubishi Pajero CK V6 Recon engine fitted early 2023 Vehicle collected under warranty 4 Aug 2024 Not returned as at July 2026
Submitted directly to this site on 13 July 2026. Publication consented. Consent to share on a confidential basis with MIOSA, SAPS Commercial Crimes, or accredited journalists also granted.
In Mr Jones's own words
"Had a recon engine fitted early 2023, worked well. Advised by Wayne not to exceed 2,000 rpm — which we did. However, late July [2023], on returning from Kruger Park, 16 km from Belfast, engine broke. Had a low loader take us to Mitsubishi Ermelo. As we had a one-year warranty from Wayne, he agreed to collect the car under warranty to repair. We still await its return.
We have two years of text messages on my phone of replies from 'yes, it's ready' to no replies, 'oh, problem with parts' — all BS." — Alan Jones, submission to reconenginesreview.co.za, 13 July 2026
"Since [4 August 2024] we have two years of emails back and forth with him and, despite him telling me 'yes, putting engine in now' — which is total rubbish — and paying a deposit balance to get our car back, nothing. I am a British citizen living half the year in South Africa and six months in Koh Samui, Thailand.
I wrote to the Devi programme after my neighbour saw this crook on TV, but because our stories are the same they told me they would not feature our story. I'm now, after three years, contemplating scrapping our beautiful and much-loved V6 Pajero." — Alan Jones, submission to reconenginesreview.co.za, 13 July 2026
Where this matches the documented pattern
- Warranty as bait, then hostage. Mr Meintjies agreed to collect the vehicle under his own one-year warranty on 4 August 2024. Twenty-three months later, no return. The same "collected under warranty, then held indefinitely" sequence is documented in the Philip Honiball Google review's observation that Mr Meintjies "picks victims" and "then holds all the cards" once the vehicle is on his premises.
- Shifting excuses over multiple years. "Yes, it's ready" → no reply → "oh, problem with parts." The same recurring narrative appears on the My Story page and in the Rene U and Jaco B HelloPeter reviews.
- Additional payments demanded after original settlement. Mr Jones paid a "deposit balance" to try to get the vehicle back — mirroring the mid-job additional-payment pattern seen in every documented account on this site.
- Broadcaster confirmation of recurrence. eNCA's Devi programme reportedly declined to feature Mr Jones's case because it was too similar to others already known to them. That is external confirmation, from an established South African consumer-watchdog broadcaster, that the alleged conduct described on this site is a repeating pattern across many complainants.
- A "not to exceed 2,000 rpm" instruction on a reconditioned engine is not standard practice for a properly rebuilt engine. Read together with the mechanical defects catalogued in the Philip Honiball review (bumper beam reversed, four bolts of eight, dipstick fitted incorrectly, turbo intake unclamped, diesel leaks), it is consistent with a pattern of work that would not withstand normal use.
Evidence Mr Jones has offered to supply
- Years of WhatsApp messages between himself and Mr Meintjies
- Warranty documentation for the first repair (2023)
- Payment records held by his attorney in Pietermaritzburg
- NATIS licence documents and complete vehicle ownership registration
- A dated photograph of Mr Meintjies at Mr Jones's premises collecting the vehicle on 4 August 2024
Evidence is being collected directly from Mr Jones. It will be reviewed, redacted for personal information, and — with his ongoing consent — added to this record. Mr Jones has been advised to consider lodging a formal complaint with the Motor Industry Ombudsman of South Africa: unlike the site operator's own MIOSA matter, where the finding was constrained by lack of paperwork (see Legal Options), Mr Jones has documentary evidence that should support a substantive determination.